This is the product description text that will appear here.
Quantity
1
Description
Since the release of Woodpeckers in-DEXABLE squares, they have been swamped with requests for a smaller version. Well, it was already done (almost). The final testing wasn't complete in time to launch them together, so here they are, with a...
Reviews
3.8
6 ratings
5
4
3
2
1
It’s decent but it sticks
Every time I move the blade the button sticks on the number holes. Like every single hole.. is this normal? I didn’t expect this from woodpeckers. My last indexable mini fell apart.. the button fell out of the head of the square.. now this one catches and sticks on every inch of blade. Can we get me one that doesn’t have this happening with? Or send me a new one or something? That’s like $400 I had spent on the mini squares and they both have issues with them. Hopefully someone from woodpeckers or Kjp see this. I didn’t want to complain but it’s really annoying and it delays me from getting my work done smoothly and efficiently. I also need to use 2 hands now to get it unstuck so I can use it as often as I need it. I’m using holding material in one hand and use the other to take a precise measurement but with this square I can’t..
S
Sloan · December 19, 2025
I want to love it.
Compared to my Irwin of the same size, the body is smaller and so the 90deg reference face is significantly shorter. Both squares nest into eachother perfectly and both are the same "squareness". So the only advantage is the indexing capabilities, which are handyish but other tools like Incra Tiny T are easier to use and do the same job. The top offset is 1/4" perfect for finish carpentry reveals. Would have been a huge bonus if it had a 1/4" index for corner reveal marking (door casing reveals). This is my main use for the tool so the extra dollars are not justified. Its nice but for my use I would not recommend at this price.